Escaping the Apple ecosystem: a view of the setup

Here is a quick & dirty view of the physical and logical setup of my new workstation. The linux part is not finished yet (no drivers for Radeon GPU, thank you Ubuntu), it's a work in progress.

esx
Not depicted: each USB controller sports 4 USB ports (yellow) or 2 USB ports (pink and blue). It allows me to plug few devices that won't be "managed" by the USB switch.
USB devices plugged-in on the switch are made available to only one VM at a time. When I press the switch button, they disappear for the current VM and are presented to the next one.

Escaping the Apple ecosystem: part 3

In part 2, I was able to create and use a Windows 7 VM with the Radeon R9 270x in passthrough. It works really great. But OSX and Linux where more difficult to play with.

List of virtual machines

List of virtual machines


Since then, I've made tremendous progress: I've managed to run an OSX 10.11.6 VM properly, but more importantly, I've managed to run my native Mac OS X 10.6.8 system as a VM, with the Mac's Radeon in passthrough.
I've removed my Mac OS X SSD and the Mac's graphics card from the Mac Pro tower, and installed them into the PC tower. Then I've created the VM for the 10.6.8 system, configured ESXi to use Mac's Radeon with VT-d, etc.
The only real problem here is that adding a PCI card into the PC tower makes PCI device numbers change: it breaks almost every passthrough already configured. I had to remake VT-d config for the Windows VM. Apart from that, it went smoothly.
Currently, I'm working on my native 10.6.8 system, that runs as a VM, and the Windows VM is playing my music (because the Realtek HD audio controller is dedicated to the Windows VM).
Moving from a Mac Pro with 4-core 2.8 GHz Xeon to a 6-core 3.5 GHz Core i7 really gives a boost to my old 10.6.8 system.

Running both OSes, the box is almost as silent as the Mac Pro while packing almost twice as more raw CPU power and 2.7x more GPU power.

The Mac Pro is now empty: no disks, no graphics card, and will probably go on sale soon.

to-do list:

  • secure the whole infrastructure ;
  • install 2nd-hand MSI R9 270x when it's delivered ;
  • properly setup Linux to use AMD graphics card.

I might also add few SSDs and a DVD burner before year's end.

Firefox mange mon CPU

Comme je suis vieux et extrémiste, j'ai décidé de ne pas adhérer aux mises à jour continuelles des systèmes d'exploitation Apple. Ce que proposent les nouvelles versions est rarement intéressant (cloud, flicage des utilisateurs, baisse des performances, App Store, etc.).
Le souci avec les vieux logiciels, c'est le manque de sécurité qu'ils offrent. Les nouveaux ne valent guère mieux, mais la mesure du risque se fait sur le nombre de failles connues, et donc à ce compte là, les anciennes versions sont toujours perdantes. Ne faisant plus évoluer mon système, mais passant mon temps sur internet, j'ai donc du m'adapter : virer mon Safari préhistorique, et installer un navigateur bien à jour, au taquet, fourni par un éditeur qui lui ne se fout pas de ma gueule (comprendre qu'il n'oblige pas les gens à acheter un nouveau Mac pour bénéficier d'un navigateur web à jour).

Bref, j'utilise Firefox.

J'en étais content, jusqu'au moment où j'ai trouvé qu'il était relativement lent, puis lent, puis très lent, puis très très lent. En fait, ce navigateur mange mon CPU. Petit à petit. Si vous êtes le genre d'utilisateur qui allume/éteint sa machine tous les jours, vous n'avez pas ce problème. Mais si vous laissez le chauffage d'appoint allumé 24/7/365, alors vous pourriez constater ce genre de chose :

firefox_cpu-580

Avec le temps qui passe Firefox consomme de plus en plus de cycles de processeur. Après une poignée d'heures, il est environ à 18%. Sans rien faire avec, 200 minutes plus tard il consomme 21% du CPU. Après 1000 minutes, il oscille entre 33 et 35% CPU.
On constate aussi que le nombre de threads de l'application gonfle tranquillement.

J'ai tenté d'accuser les extensions, mais je n'en utilise que 2 et une fois désactivées Firefox avait le même comportement. J'ai aussi tenté d'analyser le comportement du navigateur avec Instruments, sans succès. Je ne comprends pas d'où vient le souci. Peut être d'une des pages web que je garde ouvertes en permanence… Quoi qu'il en soit, c'est un peu dommage, je vais devoir programmer un redémarrage de Firefox toutes les nuits

L4D2: comparative benchmark between Mac OS X and Windows

Back in december 2012 I've benchmarked (shortly) native and virtualized Mac OS X against virtualized Windows.
Few days ago, I've dedicated a 250G B SSD to a Windows 7 installation, inside my Mac Pro. Weird thing for me to go back and forth between Mac OS X and Windows. I'm more accustomed to +50 days long uptime. Admittedly my various attempts to put Mac OS X into deep sleep, reboot on Windows, and go back later to a fully restored Mac OS X session right out from deep sleep, are failing. That's another story.
Nevertheless, I'm using this Windows system as a playground.

Inside this Mac Pro model 2010, I've one Xeon quad core 2.8 GHz with 24 GB RAM, and a Radeon HD 5770. One SSD is dedicated to Mac OS X 10.6.8, and one SSD is dedicated to Windows 7 Pro 64 bits (with latest stable Catalyst drivers). Both systems are using the latest Steam client with a fully updated and clean Left 4 Dead 2 install.

I've recorded a demo, and played back this file on both systems with identical video settings, recording fps numbers during the playback. The demo is 17827 frames long, and video settings are "MSAA x4", "Anisotropic 8x", "vertical sync triple", "resolution 1920x1200", "shader detail very high', "effect detail high", "model/texture detail high".

The playback is a bit laggy on Mac OS X, especially when the player is looking at fire. It would be playable, but not a very smooth experience. The playback is better on Windows.
Here is the plot of numbers of frames calculated at a given fps rate. For example, on Mac OS X (black line) a total of 4 frames were calculated at a frame rate of 10 fps. On Windows, 90 frames where calculated at a frame rate of 47 fps.

click plot to display full size

click plot to display full size

Windows 7 has better drivers, and may be the game itself is coded better. The fact is some situations in the game are not handled very well by the GPU on Mac OS X. The huge spike around 30 fps means that ~2500 frames were computed at about 30 fps. Not good. But more importantly the global shape of the plot shows a spread of fps values from as low as 10 fps to 60 fps. Note that the log scale on Y does mask isolated frames (Y=1).
Windows does a better job here, with only a handful of frames below 40 fps.

Fortunately L4D2 is an old game, and my hardware is enough to handle it nicely even on Mac OS X (I usually play at 1600x1000), but being able to push it a little further with full quality on Windows is a nice thing. I hope L4D3 will run ok too, some day, in a not too distant future.

Edit

To complete the comparison, I've made a Cinebench R15 benchmark. The OpenGL score on Windows 7 is ~64 fps, and the same test on Mac OS X 10.6.8 is ~53 fps. On CPU side both OSes score around 440.

Entrez dans les Limbes

J'ai découvert à l'occasion des soldes d'Halloween chez Steam un petit jeu formidable : Limbo. Il est sombre (très), cruel (un peu), astucieux et surtout d'un esthétisme impressionnant. J'avais déjà été enchanté par Machinarium, un autre jeu "indépendant". Je me suis aussi régalé avec Limbo. Les énigmes ne sont pas aussi compliquées que dans Machinarium, et chaque tableau repose sensiblement plus sur l'adresse du joueur que sur sa réflexion.
Il existe sur Mac, Windows et iOS. En version électronique ou physique. Via Steam, vous pouvez télécharger la démonstration gratuite.
À ne pas mettre dans les mains des plus jeunes tout de même...

limbo_screenshot

Benchmark: virtualized OS X vs Windows

Lately I've discussed the performance drop between a virtualized Mac OS X and the same system running natively on a Mac Pro. My virtualization project is not limited to Mac OS X of course. Windows, Linux, FreeBSD are also part of the deal. In order to further test my virtualized workstation setup, I've created a Windows Server 2008 R2 VM.
Every VM runs on top of ESXi, only one VM at a time so no interference is possible. Each VM uses the ATI Radeon HD 5770 PCIe card directly thanks to VMware passthrough mode. ESXi is running on a Mac Pro, and the native OS X system runs on the same Mac Pro so I have a consistent hardware platform.

I've given Cinebench a ride on this Windows VM, and I must admit, results are appalling… for Mac OS X:

Cinebench OS X 10.8.2 native OS X 10.8.2 VM Windows Server 2008 R2 VM
CORES 4 4 4
LOGICALCORES 2 1 1
MHZ 2800 2663 2800
CBCPUX 5.038354 3.797552 3.962436
CBOPENGL 32.284100 27.319487 53.606468

I'm afraid a virtualized Windows system achieves better results than a native OS X. And not just a little bit better, but 66% better. We knew for ages that Apple ships crappy graphics card drivers and almost obsolete OpenGL. This is one more evidence.

After further research, I've finally succeeded in launching some Valve games on this windows VM: Half Life Lost Coast and Portal. They both run quite nicely. The HL Lost Coast integrated benchmark scores a very nice 229,82 FPS and the portal frame rate displayed by the command cl_showfps 1 was around 200 and 300.
On Team Fortress 2 I've been able to make a proper benchmark. That's not as detailed as my L4D2 bench, but that's enough.
I've recorded a game on TF2, Mac OS X 10.6.8, played it back with the timedemo command on the same system, and on the Windows VM.
It's a short demo (4099 frames) featuring a control point map with 12 players (11 bots, and me). Video settings were the same on both sides, of course.

Mac OS X 10.6.8 Native Windows VM
average 59.04 fps 59.83 fps
variability 2.764 fps 3.270 fps

It looks like something is capping the fps at 60. I don't know if it comes from my settings, or if it comes from outside the game. Both scores are very similar. Mac OS X's only bonus is the smaller variability, meaning its frame rate is more consistent throughout the demo. If only I had sound in my VMs…

Next step: try to configure a Ubuntu VM so it can use the ATI Radeon HD 5770 PCIe card, and make good use of my Steam On Linux beta test account.

Mac OS X on VMware ESXi: hardware challenges

I've decided to try and build a virtualized workstation that would allow me to use multiple OSes on top of my Mac Pro. That's no piece of cake, because it mainly boils down to using a professional hypervisor optimized for hardware abstraction and headless operation as a power-user workstation with full hardware access and as much GPU power as possible. It does not look like something that has a bright future, does it?

After some experiment I have a pretty good idea of what is possible and what is not possible. Lets compare the Mac Pro's hardware and what you can access from within a virtual machine running in ESXi on the same Mac Pro:

Mac Pro VM
CPU Full power with HT No HT, number of cores depends on the VM setup, but frequency can be lower than expected.
Running OS X 10.8 I got 2.66 GHz in the VM despite the 2.8 GHz Xeon
RAM Full RAM Depends on the VM setup, but if you use device passthrough, you must reserve the full amount of RAM, meaning you lose the ability to share unused RAM with other VMs. If you are a virtualization expert you know it's not good.
SATA Full access Possibility of raw device mapping
USB Full access, plug & play Passthrough available but limited: no keyboard and no mouse. Probably no plug & play either. Tested with logitech headphones: flaky sound with kernel log message complaining about a problem in USB driver, any app (itunes, chrome...) won't play sound any longer than 2 or 3 seconds before shutting down the sound output.
Bluetooth Full access none pseudo-passthrough available via USB devices, not tested.
Wifi Full access Passthrough possible, but not tested
LAN Full access Passthrough possible, not tested. Otherwise access via the virtual network stack of the hypervisor, works well.
Firewire Full access, plug & play none.
Graphics card Full access Passthrough possible, with a performance drop.
Some softwares will just not work, see last part of this post for details.
DVD Full access Passthrough possible, not tested.
Access via VCenter possible.
Optical sound output Full access none Passthrough of the Intel HD sound controler possible, but playback is out of sync, and so flaky it's unusable. On windows the sound device application commits suicide, on OS X the sound output is not even available.

This chart means important things. Running a virtualized Mac OS X workstation on top of ESXi will prevent me from:

  • using 100% CPU power (not that important)
  • using 100% of my RAM (not that important)
  • using 100% of my already limited GPU power (kind of important)
  • plug in USB devices like thumbdrives (important)
  • plug in Firewire devices like my CF-card reader (important)
  • accessing bluetooth device (I don't care)
  • using my optical Edirol MA-15D or any other good speaker (important)

Lets face it, those limitations alone could bring my project to a halt. I don't want a crappy workstation, and if virtualization is not the way to go, I might go the other way around and buy a small PC for every other OS I want to run. Even if it defeats the all-in-one purpose of the virtualization, it would allow me full access to each hardware resources.

Below, the "About this Mac" dialog featuring the VM on top and the real Mac Pro under.

comparison of about this mac dialog between OS X VM, and OS X running on the Mac Pro

Even simple hardware features are not well recognized, but it's enough for the average user experience. The GPU passthrough allows decent full screen 1080p HD video playback from youtube, and many games should work too. Unfortunately Valve's games won't work (Left 4 Dead…) as they make use of some framework that fails on Virtualized hardware.

hl2_osx[772]: -[__NSCFString bytes]: unrecognized selector sent to instance 0x2827350
hl2_osx[772]: An uncaught exception was raised
hl2_osx[772]: -[__NSCFString bytes]: unrecognized selector sent to instance 0x2827350
hl2_osx[772]: (
 0   CoreFoundation      0x988b212b __raiseError + 219
 1   libobjc.A.dylib     0x9545352e objc_exception_throw + 230
 2   CoreFoundation      0x988b5d9d -[NSObject(NSObject) doesNotRecognizeSelector:] + 253
 3   CoreFoundation      0x987fe437 ___forwarding___ + 487
 4   CoreFoundation      0x987fe1e2 _CF_forwarding_prep_0 + 50
 5   CoreFoundation      0x9878d720 CFDataGetBytePtr + 80
 6   launcher.dylib      0x0041c955 _ZN12GLMDisplayDB17PopulateRenderersEv + 2005
 7   launcher.dylib      0x00418607 _ZN12GLMDisplayDB8PopulateEv + 23
 8   launcher.dylib      0x0041b18f _ZN9CCocoaMgr12GetDisplayDBEv + 159
 9   shaderapidx9.dylib  0x0b28fb47 _ZN10IDirect3D921GetAdapterDisplayModeEjP15_D3DDISPLAYMODE + 55
 10  shaderapidx9.dylib  0x0b2db946 _ZNK19CShaderDeviceMgrDx818GetCurrentModeInfoEP19ShaderDisplayMode_ti + 38
 11  engine.dylib        0x05dbdeaa _Z14Shader_Connectb + 122
 12  engine.dylib        0x05f1232a _ZN10CEngineAPI7ConnectEPFPvPKcPiE + 106
 13  launcher.dylib      0x004151c3 _ZN15CAppSystemGroup9OnStartupEv + 115
 14  launcher.dylib      0x00415575 _ZN15CAppSystemGroup3RunEv + 37
 15  launcher.dylib      0x00415598 _ZN15CAppSystemGroup3RunEv + 72
 16  launcher.dylib      0x0041d202 _Z18MainFunctionThreadPv + 82
 17  launcher.dylib      0x0041d56c ValveCocoaMain + 140
 18  launcher.dylib      0x0040ca61 LauncherMain + 673
 19  hl2_osx             0x00001d26 start + 54
 )

I've discovered that the [__NSCFString bytes]: unrecognized selector sent to instance error affects also Hackintosh users, ie. people running Mac OS X on top of non-Apple hardware.

Next step: try Valves games on the Windows VM, with GPU passthrough.

Mac OS X Benchmark: native vs virtualized, part 2

I've been really disappointed by my last benchmark of a virtualized Mac OS X running on top of ESXi with graphics card accessed in passthrough mode. So disappointed in fact that I had to make new tests.
This time, I've decided to ditch the six years old XBench, and to use proper video benchmarking tools: Geeks3D GpuTest, and Cinebench. And guess what? Thats better.
To run those tests, I've had to install OS X 10.8.2 because Geeks3D GpuTest doesn't run on Mac OS X 10.6.8. So I dedicated a SATA HDD on my Mac Pro to a fresh install of 10.8.2, created a VM with it and ran both benchmarks, once from the Mac Pro booted from OS X, once from the OS X VM.

In the chart bellow you can find FurMark and GiMark tests results for a native OS X system running on the Mac Pro, and for the exact same system running as a VM on top of ESXi hypervisor. No tuning was done, I've used the default settings for every benchmarks.

Geeks3D GpuTest Native VM
FurMark (AvgFPS / Score) 47 / 2845 47 / 2872
GiMark (AvgFPS / Score) 33 / 2000 7 / 446

FurMark scores the same frame rate on VM and on native OS X. But GiMark is not good at all, with a VM score 4.5x lower than reference.

Cinebench's results are quite interesting too:

Cinebench Native VM
CORES 4 4
LOGICALCORES 2 1
MHZ 2800 2663
CBCPUX 5.038354 3.797552
CBOPENGL 32.284100 27.319487

VM results are quite close from reference, but the CPU frequency is reported as 2.663 GHz instead of 2.8 GHz, and the VM has only 4 CPU threads, instead of 8. This explain the CPU performance drop between native and virtualized OS X. The OpenGL score is quite good, showing only a 15.4% drop.
We are very far from the 87% drop on XBench's OpenGL test.

On the left side the native OS X, on the right side the virtualized OS X:
Cinebench results for OS X 10.8.2 native vs virtualized